Disposed

R.Varadarajan v. Naidu Mahajana Sangam

Madras HC2 Dec 2024CRP(MD)/3025/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil revision petition seeking expedited disposal of a suit before the Subordinate Court, Manapparai. The trial court requested more time; the High Court extended the deadline by a final six months to comply with its earlier direction.

What did the court decide?

Six months' final extension granted to the trial Court to dispose of O.S.No.262 of 2020 per the order dated 02.12.2024.

R.Varadarajan Vs Naidu Mahajana Sangam — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.R.P.(MD)No.3025 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 30.01.2026

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR

¶5

C.R.P.(MD)No.3025 of 2024

R.Varadarajan

... Petitioner

-vs.-

1.Naidu Mahajana Sangam, an unregisterd Sangam, rep. by its President R.V.S.Veeramani

¶10

2.R.V.S.Veeramani

¶11

3.Manaparai Naidu Mahajana Sangam, rep. by its Secretary V.P.Sankar

¶12

4.P.R.Sundarrajan 5.Venkatesan Naidu 6.Gopala Krishnan 7.Lakshminarayanan 8.Sivagnanam

¶13

9.Anwardeen

¶14

...Respondents

¶15

PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking direction to expedite the disposal of the said petition in O.S.No.262 of 2020 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Manapparai.

¶16

________________ Page 1 of 4_

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

For Petitioner :Mr.J.Lawrance

¶19

C.R.P.(MD)No.3025 of 2024

¶20

¶21

ORDER

¶22

The matter has been listed today under the caption "for extension of time

¶23

for trail Court".

¶24

2.By order, dated 02.12.2024, this Court directed the Court below to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.262 of 2020, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of that order.

¶25

3.The Court below has submitted a letter in D.No.1151, dated 06.12.2025, whereby and whereunder stating some reasons, it requested further six months time to comply with the order, dated 02.12.2024, made in this Civil

¶26

Revision Petition.

¶27

________________ Page 2 of 4_

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

C.R.P.(MD)No.3025 of 2024

¶30

4.Considering the reasons stated by the Court below for extension of

¶31

time, six months time is extended finally from the date of receipt of a copy of this order to comply with the order, dated 02.12.2024.

30.01.2026

cmr

The Subordinate Judge, Manapparai.

¶36

________________ Page 3 of 4_

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

C.R.P.(MD)No.3025 of 2024

¶39

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

¶40

cmr

¶41

C.R.P.(MD)No.3025 of 2024

¶42

30.01.2026

¶43

________________ Page 4 of 4_

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.Varadarajan v. Naidu Mahajana Sangam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Varadarajan v. Naidu Mahajana Sangam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Managing Director/Joint Registrar, Vs C. Manickam (Died), 1. M. Pitchai Pillai

Parameshwari Vs Sumathi

Adhi. Gopalan Vs Tharani

Arumugam Vs Elakkiya

Chandiran Vs Tharani

Mary Anitha Vs a.Selvam alias Savariammal