Disposed

The Managing Director/Joint Registrar, v. C. Manickam (Died), 1. M. Pitchai Pillai

Madras HC27 Nov 2024CRP(MD)/1859/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A civil revision petition challenging an order of the Circuit Branch of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Madurai. The High Court disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner to file an application for withdrawal of the deposited amount before the Commission.

What did the court decide?

Direction to file application for withdrawal of deposited amount before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Madurai.

The Managing Director/Joint Registrar, Vs C. Manickam… — Consumer Protection | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CRP(MD).No.1859 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 27.11.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

¶6

C.R.P(MD)No.1859 of 2022 and CMP(MD).No.8367 of 2022

¶7

The Managing Director / Joint Registrar, Tiruchirappalli District Central, Co-operative Bank Ltd., Tiruchirappalli.

¶8

: Petitioner / appellant

¶9

Vs.

¶10

C.Manickam (died) 1.M.Pitchai Pillai 2.M.Michael Raj 3.M.Sekar Rosario 4.M.Johnson Sagayaraj : Respondents / defendants

¶11

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order passed in CMP.No.13 of 2017 in F.A.S.R.No.138 of 2016, dated 10.10.2018 by the Circuit Branch of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Madurai.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Shanmugaraja Sethupathi

¶13

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

CRP(MD).No.1859 of 2022

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order, dated 10.10.2018 made in CMP.No.13 of 2017 in F.A.S.R.No.138 of 2016 passed by the Circuit Branch of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Madurai.

¶17

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner would submit that in the execution proceeding, the dispute has been settled and the amount has been given to the claimants and he has filed a full satisfaction memo before the concerned forum. However, the learned counsel prays for direction to direct the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Madurai to permit the petitioner to withdraw the amount, which was deposited by them.

¶18

In view of the said submission, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with a direction to the revision petitioner to file an application before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Madurai for

¶19

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

CRP(MD).No.1859 of 2022

¶21

withdrawal of the amount and on such filing, the same shall be considered by the said State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Madurai on its own merits in accordance with law. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶22

22.11.2024

¶23

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No trp To

¶24

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Madurai.

¶25

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

CRP(MD).No.1859 of 2022

¶27

K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.,

¶28

trp

¶29

C.R.P(MD)No.1859 of 2022 and CMP(MD).No.8367 of 2022

¶30

27.11.2024

¶31

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The Managing Director/Joint Registrar, v. C. Manickam (Died), 1. M. Pitchai Pillai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Managing Director/Joint Registrar, v. C. Manickam (Died), 1. M. Pitchai Pillai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Selvamani Vs Puliyammal

Saroja Vs Subbiah

G.T.L.Infrastructure Ltd., (Gil) Vs B.Mangalam

R.Ramalakshmi Vs a.S.Rajendran

Parameshwari Vs Sumathi

Adhi. Gopalan Vs Tharani