The Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition as infructuous because the lower court trial had concluded, evidence was closed, and no further adjudication was required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(MD)No.1505 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATE : 21.02.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1505 of 2019 and C.M.P.(MD)No.7952 of 2019
1.Meharban Beevi
2.Mohamed Suhaibutheen
3.Mohamed Ansutheen
4.Vahabutheen
5.Thajutheen
6.Abitha Banu
7.Thaslim Banu
: Petitioners/Respondents/ Defendants 9,10,12 to 16
Vs.
1.M.I.Ravup : 1st Respondent/Petitioner/Plaintiff
2.M.I.Faruk
M.I.Bihar (died)
3.M.I.Aysha Beevi
1/6
C.R.P.(MD)No.1505 of 2019
4.M.I.Kathija Beevi
5.M.I.Ameenammal
8.Shamila : Respondents 2 to 8/Respondents 1 to 8/ Defendants 1 to 8
9.Mohamed Kalimutheen : 9th Respondent/10th Respondent/ 11th Defendant
10.Syed Buhari
2/6
C.R.P.(MD)No.1505 of 2019
22.Abisha Banu
23.Ameer Hamsha (died) 24.Anees Fathima 25.Sharmila Banu 26.Syed Abthakir 27.Haja Alaudin 28.Syed Sultan Beevi 29.Abthahir 30.Syed Abdullah 31.Naina Mohamed 32.Mohamed Hussain : Respondents 10 to 32/Respondents 11 to 33/ Defendants 17 to 39
33.Ummul Jerina
34.Mohamed Lafir
37.Sulthana Ahamed 38.Naina Mohamed : Respondents 33 to 38/LRs of the 23rd respondent
C.R.P.(MD)No.1505 of 2019
(Respondents 33 to 38 are brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased 23rd respondent vide Court order, dated 11.02.2020 made in CMP(MD) No.10272, 10278, 10280 of 2019 in CRP(MD)No.1505/2019)
Prayer : This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order, dated 06.06.2019 passed in I.A.No.840 of 2018 in O.S.No.122 of 2013 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram.
For Petitioners : Mr.S.A.Ajmalkhan
For Respondents : Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar, for R1. : No Appearance, for R2 to R33.
ORDER
The Civil Revision is directed against the order passed in I.A. No.840 of 2018 in O.S.No.122 of 2013, dated 06.06.2019 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram, allowing the petition filed under Order 18 Rule 3(A) of C.P.C., seeking permission to examine the plaintiff as second witness on the side of the plaintiff.
the learned counsel for the revision petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the plaintiffs have already
C.R.P.(MD)No.1505 of 2019
examined their witnesses and closed their side evidence and now the case stand posted for the defendants side evidence and as such nothing survives for further adjudication in this Civil Revision.
side, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
21.02.2024
NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No das
To
2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
C.R.P.(MD)No.1505 of 2019
K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.
DAS
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1505 of 2019 and C.M.P.(MD)No.7952 of 2019
Dated : 21.02.2024
Meherban Beevi
M.I. Ravup
K. Murali Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
