Dismissed

Muthuraj.M v. the Thasildar

Madras HC20 Feb 2024WP(MD)/1839/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition contesting a Thasildar's order regarding legal heir certificate application procedure. The Court directed a fresh online application and challenged the respondent to decide within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Filing of fresh online application for legal heir certificate permitted; respondent directed to dispose within four weeks.

Muthuraj.M Vs the Thasildar — Madras HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

W.P(MD)No.1839 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 20.02.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.1839 of 2021

P.Muthuraj

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Thasildar, Arupukottai Taluk, Arupukottai, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the respondent pertaining to its order bearing Na.Ka.A1/5807/2020 dated 07.01.2021 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to issue legal heir certificate for the death of their deceased brother Ganesan by considering the request of the petitioner dated 26.12.2020 within a time frame that may be fixed by this Court.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh For Respondent : M/s.K.Christy Thebora Additional Government Pleader

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/4

¶15

W.P(MD)No.1839 of 2021

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

The present Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the order passed by the respondent in Na.Ka.A1/5807/2020 dated 07.01.2021 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to issue legal heir certificate for the death of their deceased brother Ganesan by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 26.12.2020 within a time stipulated by this Court.

¶18

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and

¶19

the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.

¶20

It is seen from the records that the respondent has issued a memorandum dated 07.01.2021 directing the writ petitioner to get an order from the concerned Court that himself and others are the class 2 heirs of the deceased Ganesan and then to apply through online for getting legal heir certificate.

¶21

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

W.P(MD)No.1839 of 2021

¶23

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned

¶24

Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent would submit that if a fresh application is sent through online by the writ petitioner with regard to legal heir certificate, the said application will be considered by the respondent.

¶25

Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader, the writ petitioner is at liberty to apply through online for getting legal heir certificate and on receipt of the same, the respondent is directed to consider the same and pass orders in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶26

With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of.

¶27

No costs.

¶28

20.02.2024

¶29

NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No csm

¶30

3/4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P(MD)No.1839 of 2021

¶33

K.MURALI SHANKAR, J

¶34

csm

¶35

¶36

1.The Thasildar, Arupukottai Taluk, Arupukottai, Virudhunagar District.

¶37

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶38

Order made in W.P.(MD)No.1839 of 2021

¶39

Dated : 20.02.2024

¶40

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Muthuraj.M v. the Thasildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muthuraj.M v. the Thasildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Silambu alias Silambarasan Vs Ashish Rawath

Kumaravel.C Vs the Returning Officer and

Ibrahim, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Mohamed Ismail. P Vs The Commissioner

Priya Chit Funds and Co. Vs S.Subramanian

Hotel Ornate(Nilgiry) Private Limited, Vs R. Maheshwaran