D.Ravi v. S.Thilagavathy
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought extension to dispose of anExecution Petition (EP No.19 of 2014). Court was satisfied with reasons regarding change in counsel and part payment. Granted four months extension to the District Munsif.
What did the court decide?
Further four months time was granted to the District Munsif to dispose of EP No. 19 of 2014.
What the court decided
CRP NO. 564 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-11-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
CRP NO. 564 of 2022
D.Ravi
S/o Duraisamy, K.K.Thazhai, Madhavaram Milk Colony, Chennai 600 051
Petitioner(s)
Vs
S.Thilagavathy W/o Palayam, No.10,32,1st St, Thiruthillaipuram, Manali, Chennai 600 068
Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s): J.Kamaraj
For Respondent(s):
M/s.P.Balamurugan
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D.Ravi
- respondent
S.Thilagavathy
Coram
P.B. Balaji
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court