Civil revision petition against an execution petition order was withdrawn by the petitioner with an endorsement in the court bundle. The Madras High Court granted permission, closed the petition, and made no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1067 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.04.2024
Coram
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1067 of 2022
N.V.Arthanari ... Petitioner
-Versus-
1.S.M.Chinnusamy
2.Krishnaveni
3.Balan
5.Revathi ... Respondents
Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 20.12.2021 made in R.E.P.No.4 of 2016 in O.S.No.56 of 2008 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Rasipuram, Namakkal District.
For Petitioner : Ms.Elizabeth Ravi For Respondent 1 : Mr.Senthil For Respondents : Mr.S.Varun Karthik 2 to 5
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1067 of 2022
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition. She has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle.
29.04.2024
nl
Index : yes / no Neutral Citation : yes / no Speaking / Non Speaking Order
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1067 of 2022
To
The Subordinate Judge, Rasipuram, Namakkal District.
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1067 of 2022
nl
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
C.R.P.(NPD).No.1067 of 2022
29.04.2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N.V. Arthanari
S.M. Chinnusamy
Krishnaveni
Balan
Sumathi
Revathi
V. Lakshminarayanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
