Dismissed

V.Thirugnanasambandam v. R.Gokilam

Madras HC11 Nov 2024CRP/497/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Revision petition sought quashing of a Domestic Violence Act complaint pending before the Special Court, Coimbatore. After the Special Court dismissed the underlying D.V.C., the petitioners sought withdrawal; the High Court dismissed the revision as infructuous and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

None; revision dismissed as infructuous on withdrawal, connected CMP closed, no costs.

V.Thirugnanasambandam Vs R.Gokilam — Domestic Violence | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CRP,No. 497 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 11.11.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL

¶6

Civil Revision Petition No. 497 of 2023

¶7

and Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 4072 of 2023 ---

¶8

1.V.Thirugnanasambandam 2.Sheela @ Raja Sheela 3.Sarojini 4.Kalaivani .... Petitioners Versus R.Gokilam ...Respondent

¶9

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for the records in D.V.C. No. 414 of 2019 pending on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore and to quash the same.

¶10

For Petitioners : Mr.V.R. Narayanan for Mr.S. Adaikkappan @ S. Sithirai Anandam For Respondent : Mr.S. Palanivelayutham ----

¶11

Page No.1-3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶12

CRP,No. 497 of 2023

¶13

ORDER

¶14

Mr.V.R.Narayanan, learned Counsel representing

¶15

Mr.S.Adaikkappan @ S. Sithirai Anandam, learned Counsel on record for the revision petitioners submits that the D.V.C. No. 414 of 2019 originally filed before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore, and later transferred to Special Court to try cases filed under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, Coimbatore, by the respondent against the first revision petitioner has been dismissed by order dated October 01, 2024 by the Special Court under the Act. Consequently, the relief sought for in this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. Hence, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Revision Petition.

¶16

2. In view of the above submissions made by him, nothing survives for further adjudication in this Civil Revision Petition. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶17

11.11.2024

¶18

MSM

¶19

Page No.2-3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRP,No. 497 of 2023

R. SAKTHIVEL, J

MSM

CRP.No. 497 of 2023

11.11.2024

Page No.3-3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

V.Thirugnanasambandam v. R.Gokilam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Thirugnanasambandam v. R.Gokilam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijayakumar Vs Manjula

Thirugnanasambandam Vs Mrs.Jeyalakshmi

Palaniammal Vs Pannerselvam

Ajay Vs Kotteeswari

M. Saravanan Vs N. Gowthaman

K.Satyavathi (Deceased) 1. Auslin Vs K.Ramadass (Deceased) 1.R.Sridhar