Civil revision petition challenging an interlocutory order in a pending suit; since the respondent did not press the suit and it was dismissed, the revision was dismissed as infructuous and the connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.No.393 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.11.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL
C.R.P.No.393 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.3258 of 2023
-vs-
Panneerselvam ... Respondent
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petitioner filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the judgment and decree dated 02.12.2022 made in I.A.No.7 of 2022 in O.S.No.56 of 2017 on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif Court, Tiruchengode.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Adithya Shri for Mr.N.Manokaran For Caveator : Mr.L.Mouli
1/4
C.R.P.No.393 of 2023
ORDER
Mr.R.Adithya Shri, learned representing counsel for
Mr.N.Manokaran, counsel on record for the revision petitioners and Mr.L.Mouli, learned counsel for caveator are before this Court.
respondent has not pressed the Original Suit, the Original Suit was dismissed as not pressed on 19.08.2024.
07.11.2024
rna Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No
2/4
C.R.P.No.393 of 2023
Neutral Citation: Yes / No
To
The Additional District Munsif Court, Tiruchengode.
3/4
C.R.P.No.393 of 2023
R.SAKTHIVEL,J
rna
C.R.P.No.393 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.3258 of 2023
07.11.2024
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Palaniammal
Mohanraj
Panneerselvam
R.Sakthivel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
