Dispute settled at Lok Adalat. Petitioner submitted revision was infructuous. Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous and connected miscellaneous petition closed.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.No.4796 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.03.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
CRP.No.4796 of 2014
T. Muralidharan S/o. Thangappan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd., represented by its Power Agent Mr. M. Sivakumar
2. Rajan S/o. Nakanaasari ...Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure praying to set aside the order passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Coimbatore made in E.P. No.1 of 2014 dated 09.10.2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.P. Gunaraj For Respondents : R1 – Not ready in notice R2 – died.
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the
1/3
C.R.P.No.4796 of 2014
petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties settled at Lok Adalat before the Trial Court and hence the prayer in the revision has become infructuous.
15.03.2024
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No mjs To
The Principal District Judge, Coimbatore .
2/3
C.R.P.No.4796 of 2014
S.SOUNTHAR , J.
mjs
CRP.No.4796 of 2014
15.03.2024
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition becomes infructuous after settlement at Lok Adalat.
T. Muralidharan
M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd.
Rajan
S. Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
