Kandasamy v. Santhi
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil revision petition against a docket order in a pending suit was dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated the main suit itself had already been disposed of.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(PD).No.1055 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.03.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
C.R.P.(PD).No.1055 of 2020
1.Kandasamy
2.Velusamy 3.Raju @ Rajendiran
... Petitioners
vs.
1.Santhi Sengodan (deceased) 2.Kandsamy 3.Kuppusamy 4.Krishnan 5.Chenniappan 6.Sekar 7.Palaniappan 8.Gurusamy 9.Pavayee 10.Sengodan Kandasamy (died) 11.Palaniappan 12.Thangammal 13.The Competent Authority and Special D.R.O. (L.A.), N.H.46-47, Krishnagiri and Salem, Krishnagiri. 14.Sellammal 15.Suseela 1/4
... Respondents
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kandasamy
- petitioner
Velusamy
- petitioner
Raju @ Rajendiran
- respondent
Santhi Sengodan (deceased)
- respondent
Kandsamy
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court