vacate the petition mentioned property on or before 06.02.2018. Though there is no door numbers whatsoever given, the fact remains that the application has been filed by the landlord/respondent for eviction of the premises, which were rented out to the tenant/Revision Petitioner. In the entire R.C.O.P proceeding, particularly, in the counter filed, nowhere the revision petitioner disputed the identity of the premises from which he was sought to be evicted, except disputing that there is no willful default and he is not liable to be evicted. When the parties in the lis clearly understood the issue and particularly the eviction is sought only in respect of the premises under the occupation of the tenant, now before the Execution Court, the plea cannot be taken by the tenant that since there is no specific mention about the identity of the property, as such, the decretal order cannot be enforced, when the decretal order clearly directed the petitioner to vacate the petition mentioned property. Therefore, the provision mentioned by the learned counsel for the petitioner under Section 51(a) and Order 21 Rule 11 (2) (j) CPC will not come to his aid.
