Allowed

Sivakumar v. Arasu Rathinam

Madras HC18 Nov 2024CMP(MD)/11212/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this single-paragraph order, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court considered a Civil Miscellaneous Petition seeking to restore a previously dismissed miscellaneous application. The court heard arguments, noted the lack of serious objection from the respondents, and allowed the petition based on the affidavit filed.

What did the court decide?

CMP(MD).No.6838 of 2023 is restored and the dismissal order dated 04.07.2024 is set aside.

Sivakumar Vs Arasu Rathinam — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

Civil Appellate Jurisdiction

¶3

Monday, the Eighteenth day of November Two Thousand and Twenty Four

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

CMP(MD). No.11212 of 2024

¶7

in CMP(MD).No.6838 of 2023 in

¶8

REV.APLC(MD).Sr.No.15034 of 2020

¶9

Sivakumar ... Petitioner/Petitioner/Petitioner

¶10

¶11

1.Arasu Rathinam 2.N.S.V.Nagappan 3.N.A.R.Nagaraj Died (The Death of Respondent No.3 On 16.11.2004 is Recorded Vide Order Dated 25.02. 2013)

¶12

4.Palaniappan 5.Dr.Murugaraj 6.Subbulakshmi @ Pappa

¶13

... Respondents/Respondents/Respondents

¶14

Prayer in CMP(MD). No.11212 of 2024:-

¶15

Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed Under Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code pleased to restore the above C.M.P.(MD).No.6838 of 2023 on the file of this Honourable Court thereby setting aside the dismissal order dated 04-07-2024 and pass such further

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

1/3

¶18

Prayer in CMP(MD). No.6838 of 2023:-

¶19

Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed Under ORDER -IV RULE -9(4) OF Appellate side Rules pleased to Condone the delay of 370 days in representation of the Review Petition(MD) SR.No.15034 of 2020 in S.A.No.1499 of 2002 on the file of this Hon'ble court.

¶20

Prayer in REV.APLC(MD).Sr.No.15034 of 2020:-

¶21

Review Application filed Order 47 Rule 1 & 2 (Under Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code pleased to allow the Review Application by setting aside the judgment and decree dated 16.12.2019 in S.A.(MD).No.1499 of 2002 on the file of this Hon'ble Court.

¶22

Prayer in S.A.No.1499 of 2002:-

¶23

Second Appeal is filed Under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sivagangai, dated 11.06.2002 in A.S.No.89 of 2001 reversing the judgment and the decree of the Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai dated 20.06.2001 in O.S.No.69 of 1998.

¶24

ORDER:- This Civil Miscellaneous Petition coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.B.Prahalad Ravi, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Mr.Abhinav Parthasarathy, Advocate for the first respondent, this Court made the following order:

¶25

This petition is filed, seeking to restore the CMP (Md) No.6838 of 2023 by setting aside the dismissal order dated 04.07.2024.

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/3

¶28

Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the

¶29

respondents has not raised any serious objection. Considering the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed.

¶30

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS III)

¶31

// True Copy //

¶32

/12/2024 Sub Assistant Registrar (CS – I/ II / III /IV)

¶33

¶34

1 The Additional District Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sivagangai, 2 The Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai Copy to:

¶35

The Section Officer, Judicial Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai

¶36

ORDER DATED : 18/11/2024

¶37

========================== ORDER ========================== CMP(MD). No.11212 of 2024 in CMP(MD).No.6838 of 2023 in REV.APLC(MD).Sr.No.15034 of 2020 Giving direction and etc. as stated within.

¶38

MK/29.11.2024 3P/4C https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶39

3/3

Sivakumar v. Arasu Rathinam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sivakumar v. Arasu Rathinam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Namasivayam Vs Ismail Musa Wakf

S. Nirmaladevi Vs Ramal

V.Harikrishnan Vs S.Sarulatha

S.Babu Vs Nehru

K.Sandhya Vs Devasena

Ghouse Basha Vs Board of Trustees