K. Kavitha v. D. Malathi
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a civil revision petition seeking to quash domestic violence proceedings, holding that the appropriate remedy for unnecessary impleadment is an application before the competent court, not revision.
What the court decided
CRP No.4046 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.10.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
CRP No.4046 of 2024 & CMP.Nos.22249 & 22250 of 2024
K.Kavitha
: Petitioner
versus
D.Malathi : Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to call for the entire records in pursuant to D.V.C.No.7 of 2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Arni, Thiruvannamalai District and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Shanmugam
ORDER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil revision petition under Article 227 is maintainable when the aggrieved party could have moved an application for striking their name off from the array of parties before the Court deal
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Kavitha
- respondent
D.Malathi
Coram
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court