V. Ramu v. U. Akash Kumar Bokadia
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses a civil revision petition challenging the imposition of costs in a recovery suit. The High Court found the Rs. 2,000 cost excessive and extended the deadline for payment.
What did the court decide?
Dismissed the civil revision petition. Extended the time to pay the cost till 04.11.2024. Closed the connected CMP.
What the court decided
C.R.P.No.4037 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03..10..2024
Coram
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Civil Revision Petition No.4037 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.22200 of 2024
V.Ramu, aged 46 years, Orville Travel Services, No.10, Tass Mahal, Montieth Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.
..... Petitioner
-Versus-
U.Akash Kumar Bokadia
..... Respondent
Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order dated 05.01.2024 made in I.A.No.7 of 2023 in O.S.No.4021 of 2019 on the file of the learned III Assistant Judge (FAC) IV Assistant City Civil Court at Chennai.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the cost imposed for reopening and recalling evidence in a recovery suit is excessive.
Whether the civil revision petition challenging the imposition of costs deserves to be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
V. Ramu
- respondent
U. Akash Kumar Bokadia
Coram
V. Lakshminarayanan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court