Allowed

M. Chinnu v. R.Venkatesan

Madras HC18 Jul 2024CRP/2469/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil revision under Article 227 sought a direction for speedy disposal of a title and injunction suit. Noting the plaintiff was 84 years old and the defendants senior citizens, the High Court requested the Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu to dispose of the suit within nine months and allowed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu to dispose of the suit within nine months; no costs.

M. Chinnu Vs R.Venkatesan — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.R.P.(PD)No.2469 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 18.07.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN

¶6

C.R.P.(PD)No.2469 of 2024

M.Chinnu

.. Petitioner

Vs.

1.R.Venkatesan

2.R.Elangovan .. Respondents

¶12

Prayer : The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to direct the learned Principal District Judge at Chengalpattu to commence and complete the trial of the suit in O.S.No.160 of 2020 within a specific time framed fixed by this Court preferably within a period of six months.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.C.P.Hema Kumar for M/s.Ganesh and Ganesh

¶14

Page No 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

C.R.P.(PD)No.2469 of 2024

¶16

ORDER

¶17

The present Civil Revision Petition seeks expeditious disposal of the suit in O.S.No.160 of 2020 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge at Chengalpattu.

¶18

O.S.No.160 of 2020 is a suit for declaration of title and for

¶19

declaration that the sale deed executed in favour of the 1^st and the 2^nd defendants is null and void, and the plaint also seeks permanent injunction against the defendants from in any manner creating or encumbering the suit property.

¶20

The plaintiff, who is a senior citizen aged about 84 years today, is knocking on the doors of the Court.

¶21

The pleadings have been completed, and the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that P.W.1 has filed his proof affidavit, and the matter is now posted for marking of documents on 22.07.2024. In fact, a perusal of the plaint shows that the defendants are also senior citizens, who are aged

¶22

Page No 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

C.R.P.(PD)No.2469 of 2024

¶24

about 74 and 72 years respectively.

¶25

Taking into consideration the age of the parties and since the

¶26

matter has been taken up for trial, the learned Principal District Judge is requested to dispose of the suit within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶27

Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition stands allowed. No costs.

¶28

18.07.2024

¶29

mkn2

¶30

Index:Yes/No Speaking Order :Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No

¶31

Page No 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

C.R.P.(PD)No.2469 of 2024

¶33

V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

¶34

mkn2

¶35

¶36

The learned Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu

¶37

C.R.P.(PD)No.2469 of 2024

¶38

18.07.2024

¶39

Page No 4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M. Chinnu v. R.Venkatesan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M. Chinnu v. R.Venkatesan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Manager Vs S.Vimala

T.Sabarinath Vs J.Santhoshini

K.S.Yaswant Kumar Vs K.R.Sadasivam

M.Arul Vs Praveenraj

Nirmala Vs v.Krishnakumar

Muruganandam Vs Kandasamy