In a civil revision petition under Article 226, the Court declined to direct disposal of a suit while a pending interlocutory application might be prejudiced. Instead, it directed the trial court to dispose of the pending interlocutory application within four weeks.
Direction to dispose of I.A.No.154 of 2018 within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.No.2368 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.07.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
C.R.P.No.2368 of 2024
Muruganandam
... Petitioner
-Vs-
1.Kandasamy 2.Asaithambi 3.Anbarasan 4.Sundaram Pillai 5.Ramamoorthy 6.Revenue Divisional Officer Ariyalur.
... Respondents
Prayer : Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to issue a direction to the trial Court to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.175 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Ariyalur within a fixed time.
For Petitioner : Mr.Usha Ramman For Respondents : Mr.C.Satish, Government Advocate-for R6
O R D E R
This revision has been filed seeking a direction to the learned Principal
District Munsif, Ariyalur to dispose of O.S.No.175 of 2010.
Page 1 of 3
C.R.P.No.2368 of 2024
shows that from 06.03.2018 onwards, the suit had been adjourned on account of
Page 2 of 3
C.R.P.No.2368 of 2024
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
KST
the fact that an interlocutory application in I.A.No.154 of 2018 is pending. If I were to direct the disposal of the suit when the application is pending, then the petitioner in the said application would be prejudiced.
18.07.2024
Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No
KST
To
The Principal District Munsif Ariyalur.
C.R.P. No.2368 of 2024
Page 3 of 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to issue a direction to the trial court to dispose of a pending suit as prayed.
Whether an interlocutory application pending should be disposed of first to avoid prejudice.
Muruganandam
Kandasamy
Asaithambi
Anbarasan
Sundaram Pillai
Ramamoorthy
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
