Civil revision petition challenging an interlocutory order in a pending suit was not pressed by the petitioners' counsel. The High Court recorded the memo and dismissed the revision as not pressed, with no order as to costs, closing the connected civil miscellaneous petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.No.2335 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.08.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI
C.R.P.No.2335 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.11983 of 2022
1. Y.Nawaz Khan 2. Y.Mazkhan ...Petitioners
vs.
T.R.Akthar Khan ... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order dated 09.08.2019 in I.A.No.112 of 2018 in O.S.No.156 of 2014 pending on the file of the Sub Judge, Tirupattur, Tirupattur District and set aside the same.
For Petitioners : Mr.M.Sathish Kumar For Respondent : Mr.A.Mohamed Mushtak
ORDER
Mr.M.Sathish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and
Mr.A.Mohamed Mashtak, learned counsel for the respondent are present.
Page No.1/3
C.R.P.No.2335 of 2022
2. A memo has been filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners
stating that the petition is not pressed. Recorded.
3. In view of the same, this Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as not pressed. There is no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands closed.
19.08.2024
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No mac
To
The Sub Judge, Tirupattur, Tirupattur District
Page No.2/3
C.R.P.No.2335 of 2022
R.KALAIMATHI, J.
mac
C.R.P.No.2335 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.11983 of 2022
19.08.2024
Page No.3/3
Y.Nawaz Khan
Y.Mazkhan
T.R.Akthar Khan
R.Kalaimathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
