Civil Revision Petition against a dismissed delay condonation application. The petitioner did not appear; the trial court confirmed the underlying suit was itself dismissed for non-prosecution on 11.10.2023. With no suit pending, the revision petition was disposed of and the connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.No.2540 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.08.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI
C.R.P.No.2540 of 2010 and M.P.No.2 of 2015
V.Kanniyappa Udayar ...Petitioner
vs.
(Cause title amended vide Court Order dated 04.07.2023 made in C.M.P.No.24703 of 2019 in C.R.P.No.2540 of 2010)
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the decree and Decreetal order passed in I.A.No.73/2009 in O.S.No.21 of 1999 dated 23.02.2010 on the file of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thirukazhukundram, Kancheepuram District and order Dismissal of the delay condonation under the circumstance of the case.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : No Appearance for R1 : Mr.A.Anandan Government Advocate for R2
Page No.1/3
C.R.P.No.2540 of 2010
ORDER
None represented the petitioner. Mr.A.Anandan, learned
Government Advocate for the second respondent is present.
14.08.2024
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No mac
Page No.2/3
C.R.P.No.2540 of 2010
R.KALAIMATHI, J.
mac
To
The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thirukazhukundram,
Kancheepuram District
C.R.P.No.2540 of 2010 and M.P.No.2 of 2015
14.08.2024
Page No.3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition challenging dismissal of delay condonation in I.A.No.73/2009 remains actionable, given that the underlying suit O.S.No.21 of 1999 was itself dismissed for non-prose
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V.Kanniyappa Udayar
M.Kanniyappa Udayar
Tashildar
R.Kalaimathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
