Dismissed

Lakshmi Loganathan v. Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited

Madras HC15 Nov 2024CRP/1660/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras disposed of a civil revision petition and a connected miscellaneous petition filed by Lakshmi Loganathan against the Respondent. Due to the petitioner's complete absence from hearings despite multiple opportunities and adjournments, the Court dismissed the revision petition for non-prosecution and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition closed; no costs.

Lakshmi Loganathan Vs Mahindra and Mahindra… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CRP.No. 1660 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 15.11.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL

¶6

Civil Revision Petition No. 1660 of 2023

¶7

and Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 10842 of 2023

¶8

Lakshmi Loganathan …Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited, Represented by its Authorized Signatory Mr.R. Dinesh. Registered office at: Gateway Building Apollo Bunder, Mumbai-400 001.

¶11

...Respondent

¶12

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the Order dated September 27, 2022 made in EP.No.275 of 2021 in CNR.No.TNCH01-024319-2020 in ARB.(M&M).No.RC/ARB/2018/5/2018 on the file of XXVI Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.

¶13

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.N.Ranjith

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

CRP.No. 1660 of 2023

¶17

ORDER

¶18

When the matter came up for hearing before this Court on 06.11.2024

¶19

this Court observed as follows:-

¶20

“No representation for the revision petitioner.

¶21

2.Mr.Ranjith, learned counsel representing

¶22

Mr.S.Namasivayam, learned counsel on record for the respondent is present.

¶23

3.With a view to give one more opportunity to the revision petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is adjourned to 08.11.2024.”

¶24

2. Again, when the matter came up for hearing before this Court on

¶25

08.11.2024 this Court observed as follows:-

¶26

“There is no representation for the revision petitioner.

¶27

2.However, with a view to give one more opportunity to the revision petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is adjourned to 13.11.2024.

¶28

3.List the matter on 13.11.2024. It is made clear that no further adjournment will be given on that day.”

¶29

3. Subsequently, when the matter came up for hearing before this

¶30

Court on 13.11.2024 this Court observed as follows:-

¶31

“No representation for the revision petitioner.

¶32

2.Mr.N.Ranjith, learned counsel for the respondent is

¶33

present.

¶34

3.Post the matter on 15.11.2024 under the cause list caption “for dismissal”.”

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2/4

CRP.No. 1660 of 2023

4..

4.. Today also, there is no representation for the revision petitioner.

¶40

5. Mr.N.Ranjith, learned counsel for the respondent is present.

¶41

6. Despite sufficient opportunities given to the revision petitioner, the

¶42

revision petitioner has not proceeded with the Civil Revision Petition. Hence,

¶43

this Court has no other option except to dismiss the Civil Revision Petition.

¶44

Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

¶45

Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

¶46

15.11.2024

¶47

MSM

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

CRP.No. 1660 of 2023

R. SAKTHIVEL, J

MSM

Civil Revision Petition No. 1660 of 2023

¶53

15.11.2024

¶54

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶55

4/4

Lakshmi Loganathan v. Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lakshmi Loganathan v. Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.G. Deivasigamani Vs Chenniyammal

Naresh Vs Nithesh

Leelavathi Vs Duraisamy

Kalaivani Vs L.Murugasamy

Radhika Vs Ashokan

M/S.Jaseema Steel Corporation, Vs M.Haja Saifuddeen