Dismissed

M/S.Jaseema Steel Corporation, v. M.Haja Saifuddeen

Madras HC15 Nov 2024CRP/1543/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed a civil revision petition and closed a connected miscellaneous petition for non-prosecution. The petitioner failed to appear at three hearings scheduled over two days, despite adequate opportunities, while the respondent was present.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition closed; stay vacated.

M/S.Jaseema Steel Corporation, Vs M.Haja Saifuddeen — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CRP.No. 1543 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 15.11.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL

¶6

Civil Revision Petition No. 1543 of 2023

¶7

and

¶8

Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 10165 of 2023

¶9

M/s. Jaseema Steel Corporation Represented by its Partners

¶10

1.Hyder Ali 2.Ashraf Ali …Petitioner

¶11

versus

¶12

M. Haja Saifuddeen ...Respondent

¶13

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent) Control Act, 1960 praying to set aside the fair and decretal Order dated November 14, 2019 passed in RCA.No. 394 of 2015 by the VIII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai, confirming the fair and decretal Order dated April 20, 2015 passed in RCOP.No. 320 of 2013, on the file of XV Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai.

¶14

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.P.M.Navaneetha Pandian

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶16

CRP.No. 1543 of 2023

¶17

ORDER

¶18

When the matter came up for hearing before this Court on 06.11.2024

¶19

this Court observed as follows:-

¶20

“No representation for the revision petitioner.

¶21

2.Mr.P.M.Navaneetha Pandian, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the Execution Petition in E.P.No. 368 of 2023 in RCOP.No. 266 of 2018 was terminated vide order dated 10.06.2024.

¶22

3.However, with a view to give one more opportunity to the counsel for the revision petitioner and the revision petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is adjourned to 13.11.2024.”

¶23

2. Again, when the matter came up for hearing before this Court on

¶24

13.11.2024 this Court observed as follows:-

¶25

“No representation for the revision petitioner.

¶26

2.Mr.P.M.Navaneetha Pandian, learned counsel for the

¶27

sole respondent is present.

¶28

3.Post the matter on 15.11.2024 under the cause list caption “for dismissal”.”

¶29

3. Today also, there is no representation for the revision petitioner.

¶30

4. Mr.P.M.Navaneetha Pandian, learned counsel for the sole

¶31

respondent is present.

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2/4

CRP.No. 1543 of 2023

5. Despite sufficient opportunities given to the revision petitioner, the

¶37

revision petitioner has not proceeded with the Civil Revision Petition. Hence, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the Civil Revision Petition. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. It is clarified

¶38

that stay already granted in CMP.No. 10165 of 2023 is vacated. No costs.

¶39

15.11.2024

¶40

MSM

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

CRP.No. 1543 of 2023

R. SAKTHIVEL, J

MSM

Civil Revision Petition No. 1543 of 2023

¶46

15.11.2024

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

4/4

M/S.Jaseema Steel Corporation, v. M.Haja Saifuddeen

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Jaseema Steel Corporation, v. M.Haja Saifuddeen

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.G. Deivasigamani Vs Chenniyammal

Naresh Vs Nithesh

Leelavathi Vs Duraisamy

Kalaivani Vs L.Murugasamy

Radhika Vs Ashokan

Lakshmi Loganathan Vs Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited