The court recorded compliance of prior orders regarding the payment of costs. The petitioner had dispatched a demand draft of Rs. 5,000, which was received by the respondent's counsel, leading the court to deem the obligation discharged despite the draft not being encashed.
Order recorded as complied with; respondent to encash demand draft.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP NOs. 1508, 1509 and 2387 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28-10-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
CRP NOs. 1508, 1509 and 2387 of 2023
J. Kamatchiammal W/o. Jaganathan, Old No. 21/5, New No. 135, Egavalliamman Koil Streeet, Thiruvottiyur. and another
Petitioner in all the revisions
Vs
S. Shajakhan
S/o Shekmahal, No. 36, K.V. Koil Street, Alandur, Chennai - 600 016.
Respondent in all the revisions
For Petitioner(s):
V.Manoharan T Gunasekar
For Respondent(s):
Ms.R.Poornima
COMMON ORDER
Though an opportunity was given to the respondent to verify as regards payment of costs, learned counsel for the respondent states that she is yet to receive instructions from the client.
1/2
P.B.BALAJI.,J
sr
way of Registered Post and the same has also been sent to the learned counsel
appearing before the trial court and the Demand Draft has been received.
demand draft has not been encashed, the petitioner cannot be punished twice since she has already taken a demand draft expending a sum of Rs.5,000/and send it to the learned counsel for the respondent who is appearing before the trial court.
28-10-2025
To
CRP NOs. 1508, 1509 and 2387 of 2023
2/2
J. Kamatchiammal W/o. Jaganathan
another
S. Shajakhan
P.B. BALAJI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
