G.Meganathan v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Revision filed to set aside an order condoning delay in appeal against acquittal. The High Court found no reason to interfere and dismissed the revision.
What did the court decide?
The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed, upholding the order condoning the delay in filing the appeal.
What the court decided
Crl.R.C.No.404 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.03.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
Crl.R.C.No.404 of 2024
1.G.Meganathan
2.Maheswari ... Petitioners
Vs.
1.State rep. By
The Inspector of Police, Polur Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.
2.Indira ... Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C, praying to call for the entire records with related to the order dated 11.12.2023 passed in Cr.M.P.No.3757 of 2022 in unnumbered Crl.A.CNR No.TNTM01-006984-2022, passed by the Principal Sessions Court, Thiruvannamalai and set aside the same.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the order of the Principal Sessions Judge who condoned the delay in filing an appeal against acquittal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G.Meganathan
- petitioner
Maheswari
- respondent
State
- respondent
Indira
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court