High Court at Madras, Coram Mrs. Justice R.Kalaimathi, on 08.03.2024. The Court dismissed a Criminal Appeal/Revision by the accused for non-prosecution as there was no representation from him in court. No substantive legal issues were discussed or decided.
Criminal Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of representation by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.R.C.No.1168 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.03.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI
Crl.R.C.No.1168 of 2019
R.Muthuraman
...Petitioner/Appellant/Accused
vs.
R.Rajasundaram ... Respondent/Complainant
PRAYER : Criminal Appeal is filed under Sections 397 read with 401 of Criminal Procedure Code to set aside the judgment dated 28.06.2019 made in Criminal Appeal No.3 of 2017 on the file of I-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Cuddalore in confirming the Judgement dated 07.12.2016 made in S.T.C.No.339 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Panruti.
For Petitioner : No Appearance
For Respondent : Mr.N.Desinghu
1/3
Crl.R.C.No.1168 of 2019
ORDER
. There is no representation for the revision petitioner. Hence, this criminal revision case is dismissed for non prosecution.
08.03.2024
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No mac
2/3
Crl.R.C.No.1168 of 2019
R.KALAIMATHI, J.
mac
Crl.R.C.No.1168 of 2019
08.03.2024
3/3
R.Muthuraman
R.Rajasundaram
R.KALAIMATHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
