This court allowed a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking condonation of a 3943-day delay in filing an application for restoration in Crl.R.C.No.835 of 2013. The respondent raised no objection, and the petition was allowed to advance justice.
The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition for condonation of delay and restoration was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.No.3531 of 2024 in Crl.R.C.No.835 of 2013
R.KALAIMATHI, J.,
Mr.S.Thirukumaran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is ready to settle the matter.
06.03.2024
mac
Note: Registry is directed to number the petition for restoration, if it is in order.
R.KALAIMATHI, J.,
mac
Crl.M.P.No.3531 of 2024 in Crl.R.C.No.835 of 2013
06.03.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay of 3943 days in filing an application for restoration.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.KALAIMATHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
