Partly allowed

Karthik @ Karthik Raja v. The Inspector Of Police

Madras HC8 Feb 2024CRL OP(MD)/989/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. In a case involving the possession of banned tobacco products, the Court observed the petitioner's young age and lack of involvement, granting bail subject to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to be released on bail subject to execution of a bond by two sureties, daily appearance, and cooperation in investigation.

Karthik @ Karthik Raja Vs The Inspector Of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.989 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 08/02/2024

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.989 of 2024

¶8

Karthik @ Karthikraja ... Petitioner / Accused No.5 Vs

¶9

The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Sivakasi East Police Station, Virudhunagar District. Crime No.354 of 2022. ... Respondent / Complainant

¶10

For Petitioner : M/s.M.Solaisamy, Advocate

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶13

PRAYER :-

¶14

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.354 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

CRL OP(MD). No.989 of 2024

¶18

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶19

The petitioner /Accused No.5, apprehending arrest at the hands of the

¶20

respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 272, 273 and 328 of IPC in Crime No.354 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶21

The case of the prosecution is that on 20.08.2022, when the respondent police were conducting vehicle check up in Sattur to Sivakasi Main Road, the Accused No.4 was coming from Sattur to Sivakasi in his vehicle. They made a search in that vehicle and found banned tobacco products. They recovered the contraband and registered the case.

¶22

Learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that there is no issue with regard to the identity of the accused.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that even as per the birth certificate of the petitioner, he was born on 02.12.2002. On the date of the alleged occurrence, he was only aged about 19 years. According to him, this petitioner is not involved in the occurrence.

¶24

In view of the above said development, this Court is inclined to grant relief to the petitioner.

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

2/4

¶27

CRL OP(MD). No.989 of 2024

¶28

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and on such undertaking affidavit being filed, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the

¶29

event of arrest or on his appearance, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Sivakasi, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the trial Court daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders and cooperate to complete the investigation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶30

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

¶31

sd/08/02/2024

¶32

(*)For Being Mentioned as Per Order of this Hon'ble Court dt.23.02.2024 in Crl.OP(MD). 989/2024.

¶33

/ TRUE COPY /

¶34

/02/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar (CS- I/ II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

3/4

¶37

CRL OP(MD). No.989 of 2024

¶38

pnn

¶39

¶40

TO BE SUBSTITUTED WITH THE ORDER DT.08/02/2024 ALREADY DESPATCHED

¶41

1. (*)THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SRIVILLIPUTUR AT VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶42

2.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.2, SIVAKASI.

¶43

3 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,

¶44

VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT @ SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

¶45

4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶46

SIVAKASI EAST POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶47

5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

¶48

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶49

+1 CC to M/s.M.SOLAISAMY, Advocate ( SR-1662[I] dated 09/02/2024 )

¶50

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.989 of 2024 Date :08/02/2024

¶51

RK/GS(13/02/2024) 4P / 6C

¶52

TRP

¶53

SA/VR/SAR. /01.03.2024/4P 7C

¶54

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶55

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶56

4/4

Karthik @ Karthik Raja v. The Inspector Of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karthik @ Karthik Raja v. The Inspector Of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J.Reetha Vs Kannikkai Muthu (Died) 2. Victoria

Kumar Vs Ponnal @ Ponnathal (Died), Muthuerulayee (Died), 1) Mookayee

M.Rajendren Vs Muthukumaran

E.G. Shanthi Vs v. PRABAKARan

Alagu Vs Tamil Selvi

P.Anusha Vs P.Sabapathy