In a civil revision petition under Article 226 to expedite disposal of an interlocutory application regarding condonation of delay in North India, the High Court directed the Sub-Judge, Lalgudi, to dispose within three months upon service of notice.
Direction to Sub-Judge, Lalgudi to dispose of the interlocutory application within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P(MD)No.267 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 07.02.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
C.R.P(MD)No.267 of 2024
J.Reetha
... Petitioner
Vs
1/5
C.R.P(MD)No.267 of 2024
9.Mallika
10.Devi
11.Rajammal
... Respondents
Prayer : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the learned Sub-Judge, Lalgudi, to dispose the interlocutory application in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in unnumbered A.S.No.--of 2024, pending on the file of the learned Sub-Judge, Lalgudi within the time stipulated by this Court and consequently allow the present Civil Revision Petition.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Anandkumar
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition is filed to direct the learned SubJudge, Lalgudi, to dispose the interlocutory application in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in unnumbered A.S.No.--of 2024, pending on the file of the learned Sub-Judge, Lalgudi within the time stipulated by this Court and consequently allow the present Civil Revision Petition.
2/5
C.R.P(MD)No.267 of 2024
2.A suit in O.S.No.150 of 1997 was filed by this petitioner for a decree of injunction. That was dismissed by the trial Court. The respondent filed counter claim and that was allowed. The appeal was presented in time that came to be returned for rectifying some defects. But the petitioner could not comply the defects and there was a delay of 1118 days in representing the appeal memorandum. The petitioner filed a petition and that was numbered in I.A.No.1 of 2023. Against the judgment and decree of dismissal, the petitioner filed I.A.No.1 of 2023 to condone the delay of 1118 days in representing the appeal suit. Eventhough notices were issued to the respondent they are dragging the matter. However, they are pressing for execution of the decree that was passed in the counter claim. On that ground, the petitioner expressed grievance in disposing of the I.A., this petition has been filed.
3/5
C.R.P(MD)No.267 of 2024
disposed of. No costs.
07.02.2024 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No
Note: Registry is directed to return the original petition to the petitioner for re-submission.
pnn
To
1.The Subordinate Judge, Lalgudi.
2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
4/5
C.R.P(MD)No.267 of 2024
G.ILANGOVAN, J.
pnn
ORDER IN C.R.P(MD)No.267 of 2024
07.02.2024
5/5
J.Reetha
Victoria
Samayapuram Handloom Weavers Co-opeative Production and Sales Society Limited
Vasu
Krishnamoorthi
Balaji
G.ILANGOVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
