Allowed

Sathishkumar v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC12 Jul 2024CRL OP(MD)/9618/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. pending in the T Husku Offence. The petitioner is accused of allegedly intercepting a lorry, abusing a driver, and threatening consequences under multiple IPC sections. Conditions for appearance, bond, and non-tampering were imposed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail on bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties; appearance before Magistrate within 15 days allowed.

Sathishkumar Vs The Inspector of Police — Dowry and Cruelty | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CRL OP(MD).No.9618 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Date : 12.07.2024

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

CRL OP(MD).No.9618 of 2024

¶7

Sathishkumar

¶8

... Petitioner/Accused No.2

¶9

Versus

¶10

State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Udaiyalipatti Police Station, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondent/Complainant (Crime No.61 of 2024)

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.E.Balasubramanian, Advocate

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. side)

¶13

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C.

¶14

PRAYER :-

¶15

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.61 of 2024 on the file of the Respondent Police.

¶16

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶17

The petitioner, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent Police, in

¶18

connection with a case in Crime No.61 of 2024, for the offence punishable under https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

1/5

¶20

CRL OP(MD).No.9618 of 2024

¶21

Sections 341, 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC, has filed this petition seeking anticipatory bail.

¶22

The case of the prosecution is that due to family dispute, the petitioner and other accused have intercepted the lorry of the defacto complainant and abused the driver of the defacto complainant in filthy language, attacked him with hand and also threatened with dire consequences. Hence, the case.

¶23

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent persons and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶24

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent Police submits that this is a second anticipatory bail and also he fairly submits that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner.

¶25

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the antecedent of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the

¶26

petitioner.

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

2/5

¶29

CRL OP(MD).No.9618 of 2024

¶30

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered and the petitioner is

¶31

ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Keeranur Pudukottai District, on condition that

¶32

(i) the petitioner execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand)each, with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Keeranur Pudukottai District.

¶33

(ii) The petitioner and the sureties shall submit a copy of their Aadhaar Card or any other identity card issued by the government in proof of their residence address;

¶34

(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m and 04.30 p.m., until further orders. He has to co-operate for the investigation.

¶35

(iv) The petitioner shall not misuse the liberty granted to him by indulging in any further offence and shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses.

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

3/5

¶38

CRL OP(MD).No.9618 of 2024

¶39

(v) On violation of any of the above conditions by the petitioner, the respondent

¶40

police shall move an application for cancellation of the anticipatory bail.

sd/12/07/2024

/ TRUE COPY /

/07/2024

Sub-Assistant Registrar (CS-I/ II / III/ IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶45

jbr

¶46

¶47

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KEERANUR PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT,

¶48

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI.

¶49

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, UDAIYALIPATTI POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

¶50

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶51

+1 CC to M/s.E.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Advocate ( SR-8020[I] dated 16/07/2024 )

¶52

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9618 of 2024 Date :12/07/2024

¶53

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶54

4/5

¶55

CRL OP(MD).No.9618 of 2024

¶56

RK/VR (30/07/2024) 5P / 6C

¶57

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶58

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶59

5/5

Sathishkumar v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sathishkumar v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Rajadurai Vs The Superintendent of Police

Anusiya Vs The Inspector of Police

Madhavan Vs The Superintendent of Police

Rajasekar Vs The Superintendent of Police

K.Vetrivel Vs The Inspector of Police

Seerangan Alais Siva Vs The Inspector of Police