Allowed

Seerangan Alais Siva v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC12 Jul 2024CRL OP(MD)/10039/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who apprehended arrest in a criminal case involving charges under Sections 294(b), 323, 324, and 506(ii) IPC. The court observed that the injured person had been discharged from the hospital as a key circumstance.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail on execution of Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties, on conditions of daily appearance, residence proof, and cooperation with investigation for 15 days.

Seerangan Alais Siva Vs The Inspector of Police — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CRL OP(MD)No.10039 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Date : 12.07.2024

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

CRL OP(MD)No.10039 of 2024

¶7

Seerangan @ Siva ... Petitioner/Accused No.4

¶8

¶9

The Inspector of Police, Vaiyampatty Police Station, Trichy District. Crime No.150 of 2024

¶10

... Respondent/Complainant

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Kalpana, Advocate

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶13

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶14

PRAYER :-

¶15

For Anticpatory Bail in Crime No.150 of 2024 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶16

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police

¶17

for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC in

¶18

Cr.No.150 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

1/5

¶21

CRL OP(MD)No.10039 of 2024

¶22

2.The case of the prosecution is that there is a civil dispute between the parties. When the Revenue Authorities visited the house of the defacto complainant for the purpose of allotment of house under Central Government Scheme, the accused persons attacked the defacto complainant with deadly weapons.

¶23

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

¶24

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submits that this is the second petition for anticipatory bail and the earlier petition was dismissed on the ground that the injured person was taking treatment in the hospital. Further, he submits that now the injured person has been discharged from the hospital.

¶25

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and also considering

¶26

that the injured persons has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined t o grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

2/5

¶29

CRL OP(MD)No.10039 of 2024

¶30

6.Accordingly, this criminal original petition is allowed and the petitioner is

¶31

ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai and on further conditions that:

¶32

i. The petitioner and the sureties shall submit a copy of their Aadhaar Card or any other identity card issued by the Government in proof of their residence address.

¶33

ii. The petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am for a period of fifteen days. He has to co-operate for the investigation.

¶34

iii. The petitioner shall not misuse the liberty granted to him by indulging in any further offence and shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses. The petitioner shall be available for the trial as well.

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

3/5

¶37

CRL OP(MD)No.10039 of 2024

¶38

iv. On violation of any of the above conditions by the petitioner, the

¶39

respondent police shall move an application for cancellation of the anticipatory bail.

sd/12/07/2024

/ TRUE COPY /

/07/2024

Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶44

GNS

¶45

¶46

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MANAPPARAI.

¶47

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI DISTRICT.

¶48

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VAIYAMPATTY POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

¶49

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶50

+1 CC to M/s.B.KALPANA, Advocate ( SR-7947[I] dated 15/07/2024 )

¶51

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶52

4/5

¶53

CRL OP(MD)No.10039 of 2024

¶54

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10039 of 2024 Date :12/07/2024

¶55

SS/GS/SAR- /30/07/2024/5P/6C

¶56

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶57

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶58

5/5

Seerangan Alais Siva v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Seerangan Alais Siva v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Rajadurai Vs The Superintendent of Police

Anusiya Vs The Inspector of Police

Madhavan Vs The Superintendent of Police

Rajasekar Vs The Superintendent of Police

K.Vetrivel Vs The Inspector of Police

Sathishkumar Vs The Inspector of Police