Allowed

Sridhar v. The Inspector Of Police

Madras HC26 Jun 2024CRL OP(MD)/9190/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving the possession of banned tobacco products. The court imposed conditions including cooperation with investigation, daily police appearance, and execution of a bond.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail in the event of arrest or within fifteen days, upon complying with stipulated conditions.

Sridhar Vs The Inspector Of Police — Corruption | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CRL OP(MD).No.9190 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 26.06.2024

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI

¶7

CRL OP(MD).No.9190 of 2024

¶8

Sridhar

¶9

... Petitioner/Sole Accused

¶10

Versus

¶11

State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Kabisthalam Police Station, Thanjavur District. in Crime No.722 of 2024

¶12

... Respondent/Complainant

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.K.M.Karunakaran,

¶14

Advocate

¶15

For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar

¶16

Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶17

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C.

¶18

PRAYER :-

¶19

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.722 of 2024 on the file of the Respondent Police.

¶20

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶21

The petitioner, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent Police, in

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

1/5

¶24

CRL OP(MD).No.9190 of 2024

¶25

connection with a case in Crime No.722 of 2024, for the offence under Sections 273, 328 IPC r/w. Sections 5, 7(1), 24(1) of Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act 2003, has filed this petition seeking anticipatory bail.

¶26

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in possession of banned tobacco products. Hence, the complaint.

¶27

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that on his advice, the petitioner has contributed a sum of Rs.90,000/- (Rupees ninety thousand only) to the credit of the Chief Educational Officer, Thanjavur District, for the purpose of providing any amenities, like, drinking water facility, toilet facility or smart class room, to any one of the Government Schools in Thanjavur District. He further submits that the petitioner is also prepared to file an undertaking affidavit that he will not indulge in any other offence in future, before the respondent Police. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶28

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that the investigation is yet to be completed.

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

2/5

¶31

CRL OP(MD).No.9190 of 2024

¶32

Considering the nature of offence and also considering the change in attitude, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶33

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate on condition that

¶34

(i) the petitioner executes a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Papanasam.

¶35

(ii) The petitioner and the sureties shall submit a copy of their Aadhaar Card or any other identity card issued by the government in proof of their residence address;

¶36

(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. He has to co-operate for the investigation.

¶37

(iv) The petitioner shall file an undertaking affidavit that he will not indulge in any other offence in future, before the respondent Police.

¶38

(v) The petitioner shall not misuse the liberty granted to him by https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

3/5

¶40

CRL OP(MD).No.9190 of 2024

¶41

indulging in any further offence and shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses.

¶42

(vi) On violation of any of the above conditions by the petitioner, the

¶43

respondent police shall move an application for cancellation of the anticipatory bail.

sd/26/06/2024

/ TRUE COPY /

/07/2024

Sub-Assistant Registrar (CS -I/ II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶48

OGY

¶49

¶50

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PAPANASAM.

¶51

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR @ KUMBAKONAM.

¶52

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KABISTHALAM POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

¶53

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶54

+1 CC to M/s.K.M.KARUNAKARAN, Advocate ( SR-6984[I] dated 26/06/2024 )

¶55

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶56

4/5

¶57

CRL OP(MD).No.9190 of 2024

¶58

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9190 of 2024 Date :26/06/2024

¶59

RK/JGB (03/07/2024) 5P / 6C

¶60

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶61

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶62

5/5

Sridhar v. The Inspector Of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sridhar v. The Inspector Of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muthusamy @ Kannan Vs The Inspector of Police

Pethan @ Palanisami Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

A Ranjitham Vs The Inspector of Police

N.Balamurugan Vs The Superintendent of Police

Felix Martin Vs The Inspector Of Police

Anandi Shah Vs The Inspector of Police