Petitioner sought police protection alleging intimidation by the fourth respondent in connection with a criminal case. The court noted an enquiry was conducted, both parties gave undertakings to resolve the matter amicably, and the petition was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9321 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 26.06.2024
CORAM :
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
Crl.OP(MD)No.9321 of 2024
N.Balamurugan
... Petitioner
Vs
4.Karunanidhi
...Respondents
Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the 1st respondent to provide adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and his family members, based on the representation dt 11.06.2024 made to the 1st respondent.
1/4
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9321 of 2024
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vivek Bharathi For R1 to R3 : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate(Crl.side)
O R D E R
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking police
protection based on his representation dated 11.06.2024.
2.The case of the petitioner is that he has lodged a complaint
as against the fourth respondent on 10.08.2023, for which, a criminal
case has been registered in the year 2024 in Crime No.190 of 2024. Therefore, the petitioner has lodged another complaint on 09.05.2024 and approached this Court, seeking police protection. Now his grievance
is that the fourth respondent has intimidated and compelled him to withdraw the complaint.
3.Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh, learned Government Advocate
(Crl.side) takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3 and submits that an
enquiry has been conducted based on the petitioner's complaint dated
09.05.2024, during the course of enquiry, both the parties have given an undertaking that they will not involve in any offence in future and they https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis will resolve their issue among themselves.
2/4
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9321 of 2024
4.Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed.
26.06.2024
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes vrn
To
3/4
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9321 of 2024
B.PUGALENDHI,J
vrn
Order made in Crl.OP(MD)No.9321 of 2024
26.06.2024
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to police protection based on his complaint of intimidation by the fourth respondent?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N.Balamurugan
Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District
Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manamathurai Sub Division, Sivagangai District
Inspector of Police, Thiruppuvanam Police Station, Sivagangai District
Karunanidhi
B.Pugalendhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
