Disposed

Ayyalusamy v. The Superintendent of Police

Madras HC8 Apr 2024CRL OP(MD)/4236/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition alleging police harassment during enquiry into his complaint. Additional Public Prosecutor stated only an enquiry was initiated and no case registered. Court recorded the submission, closed the petition, and directed that the petitioner not be harassed in the name of enquiry.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed; direction that petitioner shall not be harassed in the name of enquiry.

Ayyalusamy Vs The Superintendent of Police — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4236 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 08.04.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4236 of 2024

Ayyalusamy

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

¶11

2.The Inspector of Police, Ettayapuram Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

¶12

3.Saraswathi

¶13

4.Mahadevi

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vishnuvardhan

¶17

For R1 & R2 : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar

¶18

Additional Public Prosecutor

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

1/4

¶21

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4236 of 2024

¶22

ORDER

¶23

The petitioner, with an allegation that the official respondents are harassing him under the guise of an enquiry has approached this Court.

¶24

2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the official respondents submits that the petitioner herein only lodged a complaint as against the private respondents herein and based on which, an enquiry has been initiated in C.No.P4/NDis/120/SDOVKM/TUT/2024 and the second respondent called the petitioner as well as the counter parties for enquiry. Further, he submits that no case has been registered so far.

¶25

3.Recording the above said submission, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. However, the petitioner shall not be harassed in the name of enquiry.

¶26

08.04.2024

¶27

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis gns

¶28

2/4

¶29

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4236 of 2024

¶30

¶31

1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

¶32

2.The Inspector of Police, Ettayapuram Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

¶33

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

3/4

¶36

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4236 of 2024

¶37

B.PUGALENDHI,J

¶38

gns

¶39

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4236 of 2024

¶40

08.04.2024

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

4/4

Ayyalusamy v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ayyalusamy v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Sudhakar Vs The Inspector of Police

Marichamy Vs The Inspector of Police

G.Muthaiah Vs P.Ramesh

Gubendran Vs The Inspector of Police

C.Ananth Vs The Commissioner of Police

C.Manimaran Vs The Superintendent of Police