Petitioner sought a direction restraining police from harassing him while initiating Section 110 Cr.P.C. security proceedings. The State cited his eight previous cases and election-related bond requirement. The Court, considering his antecedents, dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2930 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 08.04.2024
CORAM :
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2930 of 2024
C.Manimaran
... Petitioner
3.The Inspector of Police, C1-Police Station, Othakadai, Madurai District. ... Respondents
Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner under the guise of initiation of Section 110 Cr.P.C., proceedings and without following the due process of law as contemplated in the Cr.P.C.
For Petitioner : Mr.F.Deepak For Respondents : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor
1/4
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2930 of 2024
ORDER
The petitioner, with an allegation that the respondents are harassing him under the guise of initiation of Section 110 Cr.P.C., proceedings has approached this Court.
2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner herein is a habitual offender and he is having 8 previous cases to his credit, out of which, four cases are pending. Further, he submits that in view of the forthcoming election, in order to maintain peace, the respondent police has instructed the petitioner to execute bond. However, the petitioner has not co-operated and therefore, a report has been submitted before the Revenue Divisional Officer and thereafter, a proceedings under Section 110 Cr.P.C., has been initiated by the Revenue Divisional Officer against the petitioner.
3.Considering the previous antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed.
08.04.2024
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis gns
2/4
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2930 of 2024
To
3/4
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2930 of 2024
B.PUGALENDHI,J
gns
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2930 of 2024
08.04.2024
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should direct police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of Section 110 Cr.P.C. security proceedings.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
C.Manimaran
The Superintendent of Police, Madurai Rural, Madurai District
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Oomachikulam, Madurai
The Inspector of Police, C1-Police Station, Othakadai, Madurai District
B.PUGALENDHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
