Petitioner alleged police harassment during enquiry over a complaint lodged by third respondent amid a money dispute. Government Advocate submitted the CSR was closed and a representation pending; recording this, the court disposed of the petition without further directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15013 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 06.09.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15013 of 2024
Mohamed Haneef Shazuli ... Petitioner
Vs.
3.Arulmurugan ... Respondents
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Anand
For R1 & R2 : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER
The Criminal Original Petition has been filed, invoking Section
1/4
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15013 of 2024
528 B.N.S.S., seeking orders to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15013 of 2024
Advocate (Criminal Side) , this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of.
06.09.2024
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No csm
To
3/4
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15013 of 2024
K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.
csm
Order made in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15013 of 2024
Dated: 06.09.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second respondent should be directed not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry following a money dispute with the third respondent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohamed Haneef Shazuli
The State of Tamilnadu rep by The Commissioner of Police, Madurai District
The Sub-Inspector of Police, Avaniyapuram Police Station, Madurai District
Arulmurugan
K.Murali Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
