Disposed

Ahmad Maideen v. The Superintendent of Police

Madras HC5 Sept 2024WP(MD)/20128/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought a writ of mandamus restraining police interference in a civil and matrimonial dispute regarding property. Upon hearing, the Additional Public Prosecutor informed the Court that the matter had been investigated and the enquiry ordered to be closed based on a complaint by the fifth respondent. The Court recorded this submission and disposed of the petition.

What the court decided

AI extract

Ahmad Maideen Vs The Superintendent of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.20128 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 05.09.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

W.P(MD)No.20128 of 2024 and W.M.P(MD)No.17085 of 2024

¶7

1.Ahmad Maideen

2.Mohamed Sadeek

: Petitioners

Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District.

¶12

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram.

¶13

3.The Inspector of Police, Kenikkarai Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

¶14

4.K.Arumugam, Inspector of Police, Kenikkarai Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

¶15

5.Rehsoon Aamina

¶16

: Respondents

¶17

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the

¶18

1/4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P(MD)No.20128 of 2024

¶21

respondents 1 to 3 from interfering in the civil and matrimonial dispute between the petitioners and the fifth respondent pertaining to the subject property in M/s.ABC Maideen Mahal, 'D' Block Bus Stop, Barathi Nagar, Ramanathapuram.

¶22

For Petitioners : Mr.J.Barathan

¶23

For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for R1 to R4.

¶24

: Mr.D.Balamurugan, for R5

¶25

O R D E R

¶26

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus,

¶27

forbearing the respondents 1 to 3 from interfering in the civil and matrimonial dispute between the petitioners and the fifth respondent pertaining to the subject property in M/s.ABC Maideen Mahal, 'D' Block Bus Stop, Barathi Nagar, Ramanathapuram.

¶28

When the matter is taken up for hearing today (i.e.,05.09.2024),

¶29

the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the fifth respondent , enquiry was conducted in current paper and the same was ordered to be closed.

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

2/4

¶32

W.P(MD)No.20128 of 2024

¶33

Recording the submission made by the learned Additional

¶34

Public Prosecutor, this writ petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

¶35

05.09.2024 NCC : Yes/ No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No das To

¶36

1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District.

¶37

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram.

¶38

3.The Inspector of Police, Kenikkarai Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

¶39

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶40

3/4

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

W.P(MD)No.20128 of 2024

¶43

K.MURALI SHANKAR, J

¶44

das

¶45

Order made in W.P(MD)No.20128 of 2024 and W.M.P(MD)No.17085 of 2024

¶46

05.09.2024

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

4/4

Ahmad Maideen v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Ahmad Maideen v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijayakumar Vs The Inspector of Police

Rajeshkumar Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Narang International Hotels Private Limited Vs The Director General of Police

Palpandi Vs The Superintendent of police

O.Gurusamy Vs The District Collector

Mohamad Kaja Abusaali Vs The Sub Inspector of Police