Dismissed

Srimohanakanna v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC15 Oct 2024CRL OP(MD)/13578/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition filed by Srimohanakanna for anticipatory bail in a matrimonial dispute involving offences under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act. The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dismissed the petition, holding that the allegations of abandonment and living with a third person made it unfit for bail.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail prayer rejected; Criminal Original Petition dismissed against the first petitioner.

Srimohanakanna Vs The Inspector of Police — Dowry and Cruelty | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.13578 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 15/10/2024

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.13578 of 2024

¶8

Srimohanakanna, 2. Veerasingam, 3. Sellammal, ... Petitioners/Accused No.1 TO 3

¶9

¶10

The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Musiri, Trichy District. Crime No.16/2024..

¶11

Archana, ... Respondent/Complainant (R2 is Suo-Motu Impleaded as Per Order of the Court District 19/08/2024 in Crl.Op(MD). 13578 of 2024)

¶12

For Petitioner : M/s.Deepan Chakravarthi.M, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 : Mr.A.Albert James, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For respondent No.2 : Mr.K.S.Duraipandian

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/3

¶15

CRL OP(MD). No.13578 of 2024

¶16

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 482 BNSS

¶17

PRAYER :-

¶18

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.16/2024 on the file of the respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶19

The first petitioner/accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 294(b), 506(i) and 406 IPC r/w. Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 in Crime.No.16 of 2024, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶20

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent Police and the counsel for intervenor and perused the materials available on record.

¶21

Considering the nature of allegations that the petitioner has abandoned the defacto complainant and started living with the third person and considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) that the investigation so far prima facie reveals the said fact, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the first petitioner.

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

2/3

¶24

CRL OP(MD). No.13578 of 2024

¶25

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as against the first

¶26

petitioner.

¶27

sd/15/10/2024 / TRUE COPY / /10/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶28

TRP

¶29

¶30

1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MUSIRI, TRICHY DISTRICT.

¶31

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶32

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13578 of 2024 Date :15/10/2024 SS/MMS/SAR- /18/10/2024/ 3P/3C

¶33

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

3/3

Srimohanakanna v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Srimohanakanna v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Muniyandi Vs Inspector Of Police

Papanasa Thevar Vs Inspector Of Police

Thangapandi @ Thangapandian Vs The Inspector of Police

E.Abinesh Vs Food and Safety Officer

Vivekananthan Vs The Inspector of Police

Rajendran Vs The Sub-Inspector of Police