Petitioner sought quashing of C.C.No.17 of 2021 alleging false implication based on a co-accused's confession and absence of specific allegations in the charge sheet. The court noted the trial had commenced and required detailed evidence, declined to quash at this stage, dismissed the petition and closed miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.4714 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.01.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
Crl.O.P.No.4714 of 2022
and Crl.M.P.Nos.2463 & 2462 of 2022
Perumal
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.State Rep. by The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch Police Station, Kanchipuram District. (Crime No.23 of 2019)
2.Sonalishah
...Respondents
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records in connection with C.C.No.17 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chengalpattu and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr. R.Sasikumar For R1 : Mr. S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed this Criminal Original petitions to quash the
proceedings in C.C.No.17 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate
No.II, Chengalpattu, in which cognizance was taken for the offence
punishable under Sections 419, 465, 468, 471 420 and Section 34 of IPC.
Crl.O.P.No.4714 of 2022
being an Advocate by profession, along with other accused persons, prepared bogus documents and arranged bogus persons to impersonate the defacto complainant for the purpose of executing a fraudulent sale deed, hence the complaint.
Crl.O.P.No.4714 of 2022
2019, and the case was taken on file in C.C.No.17 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chengalpattu. The trial has commenced, and it requires detailed evidence, hence, strong objections are raised against quashing the proceedings against the petitioner.
made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), and acknowledging that the trial has commenced and requires detailed evidence, this Court declines to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.17 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chengalpattu at this stage.
Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
09.01.2024
Speaking Order/ Non Speaking Order Index: Yes/ No Neutral Citation: Yes/No
rri
Crl.O.P.No.4714 of 2022
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rri
Crl.O.P.No.4714 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.Nos.2463 & 2462 of 2022
09.01.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether proceedings in C.C.No.17 of 2021 for offences under Sections 419, 465, 468, 471, 420 and 34 IPC should be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against the petitioner.
7 provisions across 2 enactments
Perumal
State Rep. by The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch Police Station, Kanchipuram District (Crime No.23 of 2019)
Sonalishah
T.V.Thamilselvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
