decree proceedings in I.A.No.425 of 2010. During the pendency of the final decree proceedings, there was another suit filed by her seeking for the relief of partition in O.S.No.150 of 2010, wherein the parties therein have entered into a compromise, thereby the family members have resolved to receive share value instead of seeking share in the immovable property. Thereafter, all the parties have executed a partition deed dated 22.02.2013, however, to avoid the tax purpose, lesser amount was mentioned. Now, for unlawful enrichment, the 1st respondent/plaintiff along with respondents 2 and 5 jointly colluded and executed a fake document of unregistered partition deed dated 15.03.2013 and they have jointly filed a suit in O.S.No. 7 of 2015 stating that they are having valid defence. Therefore, the material documents would show that the entire amount was paid to the respondents 1, 2 and 5, but without considering all those documents, a preliminary decree as well as final decree was passed in O.S.No.150 of 2010. Based on that, the 1st respondent/plaintiff initiated execution proceedings in R.E.P.No.11 of 2019. But, as per the order dated 14.09.2021 passed in C.R.P.No.535 of 2021, the final decree proceedings was not abstained by this court, however remanded the matter for fresh consideration in the light of registered partition deed dated 22.03.2013 and
