Madhankumar v. Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Crl.O.P.No.4550 of 2024 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.…
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail granted on execution of Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties each, subject to Rs.25,000 non-refundable deposit each and daily reporting to police.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P.No.4550 of 2024
Crl.O.P.No.4550 of 2024
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
The petitioners/A4 and A5, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 4(1)(a), 4(1-A) and 24 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act r/w Sections 420, 468 and 471 of IPC in Crime No.522 of 2023, seek anticipatory bail.
2.I had stated the words at the present since it is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent that the samples taken from the opened bottles of liquor seized from the shop, in which A1 is the Manager, have been sent to forensic laboratory report and if the result indicates poisonous substance then there would be alteration of provisions of law.
3.The facts of the case as stated by the prosecution is that A1 is
the Manager of TASMAC Shop No.1699 at SPB Keel Colony at Namakkal District, and A2, A3, A4 and A5, are employees in that
1/4
Crl.O.P.No.4550 of 2024
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Should employees of a TASMAC shop apprehending arrest for prohibition and cheating offences be granted anticipatory bail after co-accused were released on bail?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioners/A4 and A5
- respondent
Respondent Police (State)
Coram
C.V. Karthikeyan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court