In Crl.O.P.No.3724 of 2024, the Single Judge directed petitioners not to interfere in the property enjoyment of the defacto complainant and left them to work out their remedy in civil court. The petition was closed.
Petitioners directed not to interfere in peaceful possession of the property; to work out remedy in civil court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Crl.O.P.No.3724 of 2024
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
When the matter was taken up for reporting compliance, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner filed a memo dated 19.06.2024 stating that as per the Order dated 26.04.2024 in Crl.O.P. No.3724 of 2024, the petitioners have complied with the condition imposed on them regarding depositing a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- each, (totally Rs.3,00,000/-) to the credit of Crime No.346 of 2023.
20.06.2024
stn
2
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
stn
Crl.O.P.No.3724 of 2024
20.06.2024
T.V.Thamilselvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
