Haridass v. the State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought bail in a robbery case. The Court declined bail, citing the pendency of two other cases under Section 302 IPC against the petitioner, and dismissed the petition.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P.No.14402 of 2024
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
This petition has been filed to enlarge the petitioner on bail in crime No. 411 of 2024 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Ennore Police Station, Thiruvallur District.
- The case of the prosecution is that the accused persons robbed
Rs.50,000/- from the defacto complainant. Hence, the case.
- Heard both sides.
- Considering the fact that the petitioner is having two 302 IPC
cases. Hence, this Court is not inclined to allow this petition. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.
20.06.2024
pbl
Page 1 of 2
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in crime No. 411 of 2024 given the pendency of two 302 IPC cases against him?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Inspector of Police
Coram
T.V. Thamilselvi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court