Bail application by an accused implicated on the confession of A1 in a cocaine seizure case, with 5 grams of cocaine and 20 grams of ecstasy pills allegedly seized. Noting a discrepancy in the mahazar but also a similar pending NDPS case in Bangalore attracting Section 37 NDPS Act, bail was refused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.3667 of 2024
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
This petition has been filed to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending trial in CC No. 1025 of 2023 on the file of the Principal Special Judge NDPS Act Chennai.
the petitioner is having similar NDPS case in Bangalore. By way of reply,
the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in that case he was
released by the High of Karnataka on bail.
23.04.2024
pbl
Page 2 of 3
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
pbl
Crl.O.P.No.3667 of 2024
23.04.2024
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner accused of possessing intermediate quantity of cocaine should be enlarged on bail pending trial under the NDPS Act despite a similar NDPS case against him.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T.V.Thamilselvi's petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.3667 of 2024
T.V.Thamilselvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
