Allowed

V.Vigneshwaran v. the Sub Inspector of Police, Chennai

Madras HC26 Oct 2024CRL OP/27247/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted interim bail for three days to the petitioner, remanded to judicial custody, to enable him to attend his mother’s funeral rites. The bail is conditioned upon executing a bond with sureties and signing at the police station twice daily except during the funeral.

What did the court decide?

Interim bail granted for three days to execute bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to signing at police station twice a day (except funeral time) and surrender on 30.10.2024.

V.Vigneshwaran Vs the Sub Inspector of Police, Chennai — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.27247 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 26.10.2024

¶4

CORAM :JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.27247 of 2024

¶6

V.Vigneshwaran ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

State, Rep. By The Sub Inspector of Police P1, Pulianthope Police Station Chennai – 12. (Crime No.604/2024) ... Respondent

¶9

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS Act, praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.604 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Nirmal Kumar

¶11

For Respondent : Dr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate [Crl. Side]

¶12

ORDER

¶13

The petitioner herein was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 25.10.2024 pursuant to his alleged involvement in offences, which as per the FIR in Crime No.604/2024 on the file of P1, Pulianthope Police Station,

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶15

Crl.O.P.No.27247 of 2024

¶16

Chennai – 12, for offences under Section 24(1) of Cigarette and other Tobacco Products Act 2003 r/w. 123 of BNS Act.

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was arrested only on 25.10.2024, that his mother had passed away today morning at 00.30 hours and that he may be granted atleast three days interim bail to participate in the funeral rites.

¶18

The learned counsel further added that even in the eventuality of the petitioner released on interim bail, he may be able to furnish the surety only on 28.10.2024.

¶19

The learned Prosecutor submitted that besides this case, the petitioner has four other cases before the respondent-police in (a) Crime No.268/2022 for offence under Sec. 20(b)(ii)(B), 22(a), 29(1), 8(c) of NDPS Act; (b) Crime No.89/2020 for offence under Sec.294(b), 323, 336, 341, 392, 397, 506(ii) IPC; (c) Crime No.381/2019 for offence under Section 75 of TNCP Act; and (d) Crime No.546 of 2018 for offence under Sec.294(b), 341, 353, 506(ii) IPC, and he is an habitual offender. However, he conceded that the reason

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶21

Crl.O.P.No.27247 of 2024

¶22

why the petitioner seeks bail is genuine as per his instructions that his mother

¶23

had passed away.

¶24

After weighing the rival submissions, this Court grants interim bail to the

¶25

petitioner for three days on he executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, X MM Court at Egmore, and on further conditions that :-

¶26

[a] the petitioner is required to sign before the respondent-police twice a day except during the time when the funeral actually takes place;

¶27

[b] the sureties are required to be produced on 28.10.2024 before the concerned Magistrate;

¶28

[c]the petitioner is required to surrender before the prison authorities on 30.10.2024 before 4.00 p.m.,

¶29

26.10.2024

¶30

Note to Registry: Since the order is passed now at 4.40 p.m., the Registry is required to email a copy of this order to the prison authorities as well as the concerned X MM Court, and it is required to be complied immediately.

¶31

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

¶33

Crl.O.P.No.27247 of 2024

N.SESHASAYEE, J.

To:

1.The Judicial Magistrate X MM Court, Egmore.

¶38

2.The Sub Inspector of Police P1, Pulianthope Police Station Chennai – 12.

¶39

3.The Superintendent Puzhal Prison, Chennai.

¶40

4.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras.

¶41

Crl.O.P.No.27247 of 2024

¶42

26.10.2024

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

V.Vigneshwaran v. the Sub Inspector of Police, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Vigneshwaran v. the Sub Inspector of Police, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs Dr.Revanth Chakravarthy Ch

V.Radhakrishnan Vs State by

K.Rajesh Kannan Vs the State Rep.by

M/s. Krishnapoultry Tex Mill (India) P Ltd., Vs Thiru. Rajesh Lakhoni, I.A.S.

VeeyesSteel Cast Alloys (Pvt) Ltd., Vs Thiru. RajeshLakhoni Ias.

R.Sugumar Vs State Rep. by