R.Sugumar v. State Rep. by
Case brief
What is this about?
in Crl.A.No.693 of 2023 Crl.M.P.No.15111 of…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.No.15111 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.693 of 2023
Crl.M.P.No.15111 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.693 of 2023
N.SESHASAYEE, J.
This Court vide its order dated 30.10.2024, had modified the condition imposed on the petitioner which it had earlier imposed while suspending the
sentence. However, in paragraph No.2 of the order, while referring to the Court before which the petitioner is under a direction to appear, the name of the Court is wrongly given as designated C.B.I. Court, Chennai, whereas it is a designated Court for V & AC cases (Chief Judicial Magistrate Court,
Chengalpet).
2.The error above mentioned is brought to the notice of the Court at the
instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner today.
- 3.The Registry is now required to change the name of the Court in the third
line of paragraph No.2 of its order dated 30.10.2024 as 'designated Court
for V & AC cases (Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet) , and host
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
Coram
N. Seshasayee
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court