Allowed

Sasi Kumar v. State Represented by

Madras HC7 Feb 2024CRL OP/2315/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail sought by the second accused in Crime No.935 of 2023 registered for offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC over a quarrel that escalated into violence. The court granted anticipatory bail with conditions including a bond, sureties and daily police reporting.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including daily police reporting for two weeks.

Sasi Kumar Vs State Represented by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.OP.No.2315 of 2024

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.2315 of 2024

¶3

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

¶4

The petitioner/A2 in Crime No.935 of 2023 registered by the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC with respect to an occurrence which took place on 25.12.2023 seeks anticipatory bail .

¶5

It is stated that the defacto complainant and his brothers put up posters owing to the death of their father. This was objected by the petitioner, the quarrel arose, which escalated into violence.

¶6

Taking all the factors into consideration, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

¶7

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in

¶8

1/4

¶9

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶10

Crl.OP.No.2315 of 2024

¶11

the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶12

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶13

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

¶14

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either

¶15

2/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Crl.OP.No.2315 of 2024

¶18

during investigation or trial.

¶19

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or

¶20

trial.

¶21

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶22

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

07.02.2024

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

Crl.OP.No.2315 of 2024

¶28

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

¶29

¶30

Crl.O.P.No.2315 of 2024

¶31

07.02.2024

¶32

4/4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Sasi Kumar v. State Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sasi Kumar v. State Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mani Rathnam Vs Inspector of Police

Badrajalam @ Batrasalam Vs State Rep by

Manikandan Vs the State Represented by

Sivamohan Vs the Inspector of Police

Dhinakaran Vs Inspector of Police

Sanjai Kumar Brahma Vs the State Rep.by