Allowed

Mani Rathnam v. Inspector of Police

Madras HC6 Feb 2024CRL OP/345/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail sought by the accused in an FIR over a derogatory social media post against a political party leader, involving offences of promoting enmity and intimidation under the IPC. The petitioner filed an affidavit disclaiming intent to provoke caste enmity; the court granted bail with conditions including daily reporting to police.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including daily reporting to respondent police.

Mani Rathnam Vs Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.OP.No.345 of 2024

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.345 of 2024

¶3

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

¶4

The petitioner/accused in Crime No.68 of 2023 registered by the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 153, 153A, 504, 505 (1)(d) 505(1) (c) of IPC, 1860 seeks anticipatory bail .

¶5

It is stated that the petitioner has posted a derogatory post as

¶6

against the leader of the political party which led to the lodging of complaint and registration of an FIR. An affidavit has now been filed by the petitioner, wherein it had been stated as follows:

¶7

“ 3. The petitioner humbly submits that the said post

¶8

mentioned in the FIR was not posted by the petitioner with the intention to provoke enmity but to mean that the no particular community must be diverted to rage and rivalry for the sake of caste. He has expressed his view as a person who has been a victim of caste discrimination and suppression. No intention to

¶9

defame or provoke a particular caste was implied" .

¶10

1/4

¶11

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶12

Crl.OP.No.345 of 2024

¶13

Taking an over all view of the aforementioned statements made

¶14

in the affidavit, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

¶15

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in

¶16

the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sendurai, Ariyalur on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶17

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶18

2/4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

Crl.OP.No.345 of 2024

¶21

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶22

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶23

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or

¶24

trial.

¶25

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶26

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶27

06.02.2024

¶28

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

3/4

¶31

Crl.OP.No.345 of 2024

¶32

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

¶33

¶34

Crl.O.P.No.345 of 2024

¶35

06.02.2024

¶36

4/4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Mani Rathnam v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mani Rathnam v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muruganandham Vs State Rep. by

V.M.Venkateswaran Vs State Rep by

Shanmugam Vs the State Rep by

K.Divakar Vs the Inspector of Police

Naveen Kumar Vs Inspector of Police

Vigneshwaran Vs State by