State Rep.by v. Latha
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a petition to cancel an anticipatory bail order. The court held that since the respondent had regularly cooperated with the investigation and handed over necessary documents, the petition lacked merit.
What did the court decide?
The criminal original petition seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail was dismissed.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P.No.21393 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.12.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.O.P.No.21393 of 2024
State Rep.by Inspector of Police, CBCID Police Station, Puducherry. ... Petitioner Vs. Latha ... Respondent
PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 439(2) of Cr.P.C & 483 (3) of BNSS to cancel the Anticipatory Bail order vide Cr.M.P.No.3507 of 2024 dated 20.08.2024 of learned Principal Sessions Judge Court, Puducherry in connection with Cr.No.13 of 2023 pending investigation on file of the petitioner police and issued Warrant of Arrest in the interest of Justice.
For Petitioner ... Mr.K.S.Mohandass Public Prosecutor (Puducherry) Assisted by N.Dhanalakshmi Government Advocate(Puducherry) For Respondent ... Ms.T.Mathi
ORDER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail order should be cancelled given the accused's lack of cooperation in the investigation.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
State Rep.by Inspector of Police, CBCID Police Station, Puducherry
- respondent
Latha
Coram
A.D. Jagadish Chandira
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court