Ms.X v. M Jothi
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court cancelled the anticipatory bail granted to a defacto accused. The court found the accused had suppressed an earlier rejection of his bail petition and failed to comply with court-imposed conditions, leading to the cancellation of the bail order.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition allowed; anticipatory bail granted to the first respondent in Crl.O.P.No.9430 of 2023 stands cancelled.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.12.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
CRL MP NO. 13866 of 2023 in Crl.M.P.No.10830 of 2023 in Crl.O.P.No.9430 of 2023
Ms.X
Petitioner(s)
Vs
1.M.Jothi
2.State rep. by The Inspector Of Police W19 Awps Adyar Police Station, Adyar, Chennai. (crime No.4/2021)
3.The Inspector Of Police Abhiramam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District
4.MUNIASAMI S/o Muthu, Police Constable, Abhiramam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District (R3 And R4 are Suo Motu Impleaded As Per Dt 20/09/2023 In Crl Mp No 13866/2023 In Crl Op No 9430/2023)
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail granted to the accused should be cancelled due to suppression of earlier dismissal and non-compliance with conditions.
Whether the accused had suppressed the earlier dismissal of his bail application before the Madurai Bench.
Whether the accused failed to comply with conditions imposed by the Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ms. X
- respondent
1.M. Jothi
- respondent
State rep. by The Inspector Of Police W19 Awps Adyar Police Station, Adyar, Chennai
- respondent
The Inspector Of Police Abhiramam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District
- respondent
MUNIASAMI S/o Muthu, Police Constable, Abhiramam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court