The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition regarding the first petitioner as infructuous upon noting his arrest and remand to judicial custody. The matter concerning the second petitioner was listed for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.16561 of 2024
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the 1st petitioner / A2 had been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 22.07.2024. Therefore, the anticipatory bail petition has become infructuous so far as the 1st petitioner / A2 is concerned.
2.Recording the above submission of the learned Government (Criminal Side), this criminal original petition stands dismissed as against the 1st petitioner / A2.
3.So far as the 2nd petitioner / A3 is concerned, list the matter once again on 06.08.2024. Counter to be filed.
24.07.2024
smv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail petition had become infructuous due to the arrest of the first petitioner?
1st Petitioner/A2
2nd Petitioner/A3
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
