A petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to two respondents was dismissed for non-prosecution, as the petitioner made no representation on two consecutive listings despite the matter being posted under the caption 'For Dismissal'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No. 15948 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.09.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL
Crl.O.P.No. 15948 of 2024
E.Dhanasekaran ... Defacto Complainant/Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 483(i)(b) of BNS Act, to cancel the bail granted to the second and third respondents in Crl.M.P.No. 526 of 2024 before the Principle Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For 1st Respondent : Mr. S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
P.DHANABAL, J.
vsg
1
Crl.O.P.No. 15948 of 2024
ORDER
There was no representation for the petitioner on 24.09.2024 and
today also, there is no representation for the petitioner, though the matter was
posted under the caption 'For Dismissal'.
2. Hence, this petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
26.09.2024
vsg
Crl.O.P.No. 15948 of 2024
2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
E.Dhanasekaran
The Inspector of Police Pochampallai Krishnagiri District
Kumaresan
Soundar Rajan
P.Dhanabal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
