Dhanasekaran v. Home, Prohibition and Excise Department
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application rendered moot because the petitioner had already been arrested; petitions dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.14106 & 14138 of 2024
P.DHANABAL, J.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) represented that the petitioner was arrested on 24.09.2024. Hence, grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner would not arise.
25.09.2024
nsl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail could be granted when the petitioner had already been arrested.
Petitioner (unnamed in text)
P.Dhanabal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court